concept of consciousness :: essays research papers

An individual is somewhere in space-time, and not somewhere else. Except for God, of course, who was invented to represent all contradictions in blessed harmony. Hes allwhere and everywhen, though at the same time, as it were, not in time or space3. But the upshot of this is that every individual has a tier of view, a perspective, and apprehends the world, so far as it can apprehend the world, from somewhere and not nowhere4 (Nagel 1986). If taken in isolation, the feature of organism somewhere in particular affects all kinds of individuals, not just humans. But only those individuals that can view something can presumably have a point of view. Thus Searle again Subjectivity has the further consequence that all of my conscious forms of intentionality that give me information about(predicate) the world independent of myself-importance are always from a special point of view. The world itself has no point of view, but my access to the world through my conscious states is always p erspectival. (ibid. 95).5 In itself, however, that could be true of any other living thing. Nor is it a requirement to be alive an artificial eye has a point of view. More generally, as shown in the excellent discussion of this subject in (Proust 1997), aspectuality can be seen as a consequence of mere differences of informational channels, and doesnt therefore require any level of consciousness. Perspective might itself be of two kinds. This can be seen by asking Does a still camera have a genuine point of view? One causal agency to deny this is that for a still camera there is nothing that corresponds to the difference between locality in time, and locality in space. For a living individual, these stick slightly assorted problems. For there are different ways in which we might care about the effects of our actions in distant space, and in different times. Time is asymmetrical in this sense (among others) we care more, or quite differently, about what happens in the future than about what happened in the past. But although the things we care about may, of course, be unevenly distributed, space has no uniformly privileged direction. So temporal perspectivity appears seems to constitute a more serious species of subjectivity than the spatial kind. straight perspectivity is sometimes equated with subjectivity in general, as suggested in the last quotation from Searle above. Yet subjectivity is also associated with the self, and the temporal form of perspectivity actually causes problems for the view that my self is my subjectivity.